Case Study — A $30M Creative Agency × Revenue Forensics
§ CASE STUDY Creative production · workflow automation

From 5 days to 3 hours: how a $30M creative agency rebuilt ad-variant production.

A full-service creative agency was spending five days turning one design into fifty placements — by hand. The fix wasn't new software — it was seeing that the leverage lived in tools they already owned.

Time / 50 placements
5 days3 hrs
Production time cut
−97%
New headcount
0
§ THE CLIENT

The client is a full-service experiential and creative agency with an in-house team of production designers specializing in 2D advertising assets built in Adobe Photoshop.

The creative was strong and the team was skilled. The problem lived one level down — in the mechanical work of taking an approved design and stamping it across every placement a campaign demanded.

Industry
Experiential & creative
Revenue
~$30M
Team
In-house production design
Environment
Adobe Photoshop
§ THE CHALLENGE

Adapting a single ad creative across dozens of placements — bus shelters, billboards, transit posters, digital out-of-home — was entirely manual. Every format meant opening the source file, resizing layouts, repositioning elements, adjusting typography, exporting, then repeating across fifty or more placements per campaign.

A full set of digital and print assets from one design took an average of five days — too slow for fast-moving campaign timelines, and far too costly for the pre-approval stage, where the work hadn't even been client-approved yet.

High designer hours spent on repetitive, low-creativity resizing.

Inconsistencies introduced across variants during manual resizing.

Pre-approval assets requiring the same effort as final production files.

No scalable system for managing source files and their derivatives.

§ THE APPROACH

The goal was never to replace designers — it was to eliminate the repetitive mechanical work, freeing them for the creative decisions that actually matter. We evaluated the full landscape before committing:

DAM platformsDigital asset management with Photoshop-native integrations.
Adobe CC Libraries & TemplatesShared asset reuse across the team.
Workflow automation platformsTools focused on creative production pipelines.
Adobe scripting (ExtendScript / JS)Automating repetitive Photoshop actions directly.
Creative automation platformsGenerating format variants from a single master design.
§ THE SOLUTION

The approach we landed on was a two-part stack: a creative-automation platform to generate the variants, and a custom bridge to feed it cleanly from the designers' native files. I mapped the bottleneck and the approach; their team built it.

01 · Engine

Creative automation

A creative-automation platform, connected to a master template, generated every format variant from defined placement specs — dimensions, safe zones, copy rules — in a fraction of the time.

02 · Bridge

A custom prep step

A set of scripts in the design environment handled the hand-off — organizing layers, applying naming conventions, prepping assets — so source files flowed straight into the automation layer.

design once run the prep step generate 50 placements automatically
§ THE RESULTS
MetricBeforeAfter
Time to produce 50 placements5 days3 hours
Formats coveredManual, inconsistent50 placements, digital + print
Designer effort per variantHigh (manual)Minimal (automated)
Pre-approval turnaroundBottleneckSame-day delivery

The new pipeline delivered a 97% reduction in variant production time, consistent on-spec assets across every placement with no manual resizing errors, same-day pre-approval turnaround, and production designers freed to focus on craft instead of repetition — with no new headcount and no disruption to the core Photoshop workflow.

We went from a five-day production cycle to three hours for a full set of digital and print assets — all from a single master design.

— Production Team, $30M creative agency
§ THE TAKEAWAY

The team didn't just speed up a process — they changed how production design scales, with no new headcount, no replacement of existing tools, and no disruption to the designers' workflow.

For any team running high-volume, multi-placement work, the lesson holds: the biggest efficiency gains rarely come from replacing your tools — they come from connecting them intelligently. That's usually where the hidden revenue is: not in what you're missing, but in what you already own and aren't using well.

Every business has a five-day process hiding in it.

A Two-Day Teardown finds where the money is actually stuck, and names the one to three moves that unstick it. You keep the map either way.

Book a Teardown